I have read extensively that there were “Two Gospels,” one taught by Jesus Christ and the second taught by Saul of Tarsus aka apostle Paul. I applaud the individual or group’s ability to open their hearts and minds to more than just the “20th Century Born-Again Christian” rhetoric and their Professional Faith Merchants who draw near to Christ with their lips but their hearts are far from Him as they deny the essence of Christ and teach for doctrine of God, commandments of men. However, the "Two Gospel Theory" purports that both Gospels, even though they contradict themselves, are of equally validity. The tone of what I have read 1) assumes Saul of Tarsus was a bonafide Apostle as he said and not a liar as Christ said, and 2) that Saul of Tarsus had the authority and right to contradict Christ! The papers I've read gives Saul of Tarsus' Gospel equal and commiserate authority and basis in doctrine with that of Jesus Christ. I sincerely hope and pray by the end of perusing the index page on Saul of Tarsus, you'll pay to God who promised He will give to you liberally the truth, upbraiding you not.

The “Two Gospel Theory” has caught the essence of the truth and the dichotomy, however, some of their premises are wrong and they loose sight that there was only ONE Gospel of Jesus Christ and no one But absolutely no one has the right nor authority to put forth a new Gospel of Jesus Christ. There is one Gospel of Jesus Christ and as the Nazarene Jews agree -- a group of Christian Jews -- there is a Gospel of Saul of Tarsus or the Gospel of Satan! This then, will attempt to elucidate those premises in which they error.

One individual wrote, “Saul’s Gospel taught that:

[1] The preaching of Jesus was for Jews only,

[2] Israel was to be the light for the Gentiles,

[3] Jesus did not come to overturn the Law,

[4] Paul said that the Law was nailed to the cross,

[5] If one kept the Law, Christ would profit you nothing,

[6] Paul taught Grace-only,

[7] Paul rebuked Peter and those who clung to the old way,

[8] Paul referred to his teaching as "my Gospel",

[9] Paul said the Law was for unbelievers only.

[10] When the Jewish authorities beat, killed and imprisoned the believers, Jesus "cut off" the Jews and converted the chief persecuter (sic), Saul, to become Paul, the chief preacher of the new plan and Gospel, which was to go directly to the Gentiles with the news that were saved by simply believing in the sacrificial death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.”

Indeed, that is what Saul of Tarsus tried to make the Jews and Gentiles believe, but then Saul of Tarsus was a Pharisee, a liar and a Pharisaic plant to try to destroy what the Pharisees regarded as the “cult” of Christianity from Jewish Society.

To establish that Saul of Tarsus was a liar,

Christ said,

John 5:31

"If only I testify of myself, it is a lie!"

No one but Saul of Tarsus said that he was an apostle of Jesus Christ and he was never ordained. For that matter, Saul was never baptized! Therefore, as Christ said, Saul of Tarsus was a liar!

The bonafide, true and ordained Apostle John said,

1 John 2:18

 18 ¶ Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

--------------------------------------

1 John 2:22

  22 Who is a liar but he that denieth (sic) that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth (sic) the Father and the Son.
 

--------------------------------------

1 John 4:3

 3 And every spirit that confesseth (sic) not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that [spirit] of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

--------------------------------------

 2 John 1:7

 7 ¶ For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

Saul of Tarsus taught many things contradicting the Gospel of Jesus Christ and even taught that the Gospel of Jesus Christ was actually his -- "my" -- Gospel.  Saul of Tarsus was a Pharisaic Plant to undermine what the Pharisees regarded as a "Cult" in Jewish Society known as Christianity (see Saul of Tarsus-Pharisaic Plant). Saul’s mission as commissioned by the Sanhedrin, was to undermine and bring about the demise of Christianity from Jewish society by whatever means possible.

Just look at the results of Saul's efforts. “The Great and Abominable Whore of the Earth,” the pagan Catholic Church presided over by their first Pope, the unbaptized, self-acclaimed 13th Apostle of Christ despite Matthias' ordination nearly 300 years before. King Constantine called and organized of the Council of Nicaea and hammered out the bloody Nicaean Creed -- the basis of Catholic belief.  The  pagan Roman Emperor, King Constantine, killed those Christians and monks who opposed his dictating, the doctrine of Jesus Christ.

The Catholic Church is a result of the efforts of Satan and Saul of Tarsus who was truly the first Antichrist.

The individual's “Two Gospel Theory” states that:

-> “[1] The preaching of Jesus was for Jews only,”

Initially, yes. But the promise made to Abraham that through his seed would the whole world be blessed meant that the Gospel of Jesus Christ first had to be taught to the Jews, then the Lost tribes of Israel in accordance with Jehovah/Jesus Christ’s promise to Moses then the Jews and the Lost Tribes of Israel would carry it to the Gentiles. However, Saul of Tarsus, the Pharisees and the disbelief of the Jews stymied that Plan.

-> And, “[2] Israel was to be the light for the Gentiles,”

I’m not sure what he is referring to specifically but generically, I would agree with this statement!

-> And, “[3] Jesus did not come to overturn the Law,”

“Overturn” and “destroy” mean the same thing. Christ said,

Matthew 5:17

   17 ¶ Think not that I am come to destroy [overturn] the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy [overturn], but to fulfil (sic).

  18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

  19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

  20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed [the righteousness] of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.

The word fulfill means, ful•fill also ful•fil v. tr. ful•filled ful•fill•ing ful•fills also ful•fils 1. To bring into actuality; effect: fulfilled their promises. 2. To carry out (an order, for example). 3. To measure up to; satisfy. See note at perform. See note at satisfy. 4. To bring to an end; complete.

Truly, not one word or iota of history or the law will pass into oblivion until “all be fulfilled.”

When will that be?

After the judgment of man, history will cease to have any relevance, any importance unless resurrected beings want to relive fond moments of their former earth live! Man will be judged by his history! That is the relevance of the Book of Life recorded in heaven. No can revise, change or delete it! IT WAS, IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE!

-> Then he wrote, “[4] Paul said that the Law was nailed to the cross,”

While I would agree with this symbolically, I can not find where Saul ever made such a statement. Saul was a Pharisee, heavily schooled and indoctrinated in the importance of the Mosaic Law to the Jews. Saul’s proselyting the “Gentiles” was an effort to get it away from the Jews who felt the Mosaic Law HAD TO BE OBSERVED come hell or high water.

“Supersede,” “replace,” “supplant,” “switch,” “substitute,” “exchange,” “do away with as the primary importance of...” all carry similar meanings but in the final analysis, differs from the others only by degree and connotation.

-> Then he wrote, “[5] If one kept the Law, Christ would profit you nothing,”

To a point, he was right. The Gospel of Jesus Christ is based on faith and belief. The Law of Moses was based on strict observance and following the Law to the letter. One could be an outwardly “righteous” Israelite and still disbelieve in the God of Israel.

-> Then he wrote, “[6] Paul taught Grace-only,”

This is one of most dastardly and perniciously false doctrines of the Gospel of Saul of Tarsus. Saul did not care to understand what the grace of Jesus Christ was and is.

John 1:17

  17 For the law was given by Moses, [but] grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

The grace given to all man regardless of what they do is the resurrection, the overcoming of eternal death of loosing our bodies and in essence being less than a vapor, a mist, a void for eternity.

However, Saul contradicts Christ and the Apostles when he taught,

Ephesians 2:8-9

    8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:

  9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Christ and the bonafide, ordained Apostles taught the following which Saul of Tarsus blasphemously contradicted,

Matthew 7:21-22

   21 ¶ Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth (sic) the will of my Father which is in heaven.

    22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

------------------------

Matthew 16:27

  27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.

------------------------

1 Peter 1:17

 17 And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth (sic) according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning [here] in fear:

------------------------

James 2:18-20, 22, 24, 26

  18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew (sic) me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew (sic) thee my faith by my works.

  19 Thou believest (sic) that there is one God; thou doest (sic) well: the devils also believe, and tremble.

   20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

   22 Seest (sic) thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?

   24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.

   26 For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

------------------------

John 1:17

  17 For the law was given by Moses, [but] grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

------------------------

Revelation 22:12

 12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward [is] with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.

The resurrection IS the free gift to all who came to the earth. 1/3 of the sons and daughters of God did not come to earth and receive a body but were cast out of heaven to become spirit angles of Satan.

-> Again, he wrote, “[7] Paul rebuked Peter and those who clung to the old way,”

This is a gross mistranslation in an effort to establish Saul of Tarsus as a bonafide Apostle. It is blasphemous to insist that a Pharisaic murderer, a liar and a plant whose teaching and training was to maintain the Law of Moses, could and should rebuke a bonafide, ordained Apostle of Jesus Christ for adhering to the Law of Moses. The individual provided no “scriptural reference” for his blasphemous allegation, to allow anyone else to read it themselves and decide whether his interpretation and analysis was correct on its face but incorrect as a result of mistranslation by the pagan Catholic Church.

-> He wrote, “[8] Paul referred to his teaching as "my Gospel",”

This is absolutely as I have maintained for a decade now!

-> He wrote, “[9] Paul said the Law was for unbelievers only.”

“Unbelievers” in what? The Qur’an, which for the Semitic Arab descendants of Ishmael is comparable to the Law of Moses for the Israelites. It speaks of “disbelievers in the Qur’an as infidels.” Yet the Qur’an pays lip service to a belief and a reverence for the ancient Israelite prophets including Jesus Christ.

-> Finally, he wrote, “[10] When the Jewish authorities beat, killed and imprisoned the believers, Jesus "cut off" the Jews and converted the chief persecuter (sic), Saul, to become Paul, the chief preacher of the new plan and Gospel, which was to go directly to the Gentiles with the news that that (sic) were saved by simply believing in the sacrificial death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.”

Indeed, that is what Saul of Tarsus tried to make the Jews believe, but then Saul of Tarsus was a Pharisee, a murderer, a liar and a Pharisaic plant to try to destroy what the Pharisees regarded as the “cult” of Christianity from Jewish Society. This is more of the lies of Saul of Tarsus. No where in scripture does Christ ever say He is “cutting off” the Jews from anything. If this were true, after such a short time, it says Jehovah/Jesus Christ is a liar when He repeated said throughout the Old Testament that God is “longsuffering (sic)” in His keeping His covenants with the Israelites. If Saul’s contention was true, it would mean that Christ’s true, bonafide and ordained Apostle Peter was lying when he said,

1 Peter 3:20

  20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering (sic) of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.

-----------------------

2 Peter 3:9
   9 ¶ The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering (sic) to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

-----------------------

2 Peter 3:15

  15 And account [that] the longsuffering (sic) of our Lord [is] salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
 

Saul of Tarsus wasn’t content with calling himself an apostle to confuse people despite the fact that there were already 12 Apostles, he took credit for the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

MY GOSPEL

Saul of Tarsus takes credit for and teaches that the Gospel of Jesus Christ was actually "HIS" Gospel

Romans 2:16

In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my gospel.

THE TRANSLATION OF SAUL OF TARSUS’ WRITINGS TO THE MEMBERS OF CHRIST’S CHURCH IN ROME CLAIMING CREDIT AS HIS GOSPEL

===============================

MY GOSPEL

Romans 16:25

¶ Now to him that is of power to stablish (sic) you according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world began,

THE TRANSLATION OF SAUL OF TARSUS’ WRITINGS TO THE MEMBERS OF CHRIST’S CHURCH IN ROME CLAIMING CREDIT AS HIS GOSPEL

===============================

MY GOSPEL

2 Timothy 2:8

¶ Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel:

THE TRANSLATION OF SAUL OF TARSUS’ WRITINGS TO TIMOTHY CLAIMING CREDIT AS HIS GOSPEL

===============================

FOLLOWERS OF ME

1 Corinthians 11:1

¶ Be ye followers of me, even as I also [am] of Christ.
 

THE TRANSLATION OF SAUL OF TARSUS’ WRITINGS TO THE CORINTHIANS ASKING THE MEMBERS TO FOLLOW HIM, ESTABLISHING HIS OWN CULT

No where in scripture does it say that, “Jesus converted the chief persecuter (sic)" of Jewish Christians, covertly changed his name from Saul to Paul so the Jews wouldn't know who he was, and made him the chief preacher "and proclaimer (sic) of His Gospel.”

The only witnesses (???) to Saul’s acclaimed vision of Jesus Christ was his Pharisaic bodyguard and entourage. This is not what Christ meant when He said, “by the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.”

Luke, who wrote the fraudulent account entitled the Acts of the Apostles to give Saul of Tarsus's lie some credence, wasn't even a baptized Christian. He was never an Apostle and never was among Christ's entourage so everything he wrote in his Gospel According to Luke is plagiarized from others and fraudulent.

And for Saul to contradict the teaching of Jesus Christ and say the gentiles can be “saved by simply believing in the sacrificial death and resurrection of Jesus Christ,” is blasphemy and another of Saul’s lies. But then as the antichrist, his God is Satan, the former Son of The Morning!

It is true, Saul of Tarsus was a Pharisaic plant to undermine what the Jews considered to be, the cult of Christianity and he did this by claiming to preach Jesus Christ, then when he had his own following within the Christian Church, he taught his own gospel doctrine. It’s right there in your Bible. Read it for yourself.

For those Fanatic, Inerrant Translation Literalist, don’t worry if you don’t like the way the “Word of God” is translated, in a few years, the Professional Faith Merchants will revise the Bible to agree with what they preach and still insist it is the inerrant word or God.
 
 

Return to: Journals of Discourses

Return to: Literature Index Page

Return to: THE MILLENNIAL DISPENSATION's Home Page