Therefore, using Mr. Quayle's words and deductive reasoning, he is againstany coupling of two people which does not lead to procreation. Mr. Quayleis opposed to "childless couples and marriages" whether it be because ofnature or by human design. By that same distorted logic, Mr. Quayle isfor any coupling of two people, whether it is incest, rape or abuse thatwould lead to procreation. In all fairness to Mr. Quayle, the time allottedto him for answering the question was not sufficient to explain all thenuances of his tremendously deep thought but I'm not impressed with hisintellectual acumen and I doubt given any more time, he would have donemore than firmly planted "foot in mouth." Mr. Quayle's answer must thereforestand as a "Dan Quayle Foot in the Mouth Faux Pas," pending further elucidation.It will stand as a testimony against him, before God in the Judgment, forhis lack of support for basic human rights and treatment of his fellowman.Mr. Quayle and people like you, are exacerbating the sin of Sodom and Gomorrahon the heads of the people of United States and the people of the world.
God said, "God is love," and "It is not good that man should be alone."
In the name of God, I call upon Mr. Quayle and every other Americanto restore and extend to every citizen of the United States the same rights,privileges and responsibilities as guaranteed under the constitution. Inreality, you can not give them a right they already have under God andthe constitution. All you can do is deprive them or begin to recognizetheir human rights.
Depriving people of their basic human rights is against family valuesand everything the United States so arrogantly and hypocritically proclaimsto China, Iraq, Cuba and the world!
David R.W. Wadsworth
Servant of the Most High God
El Santuario Escondido
10387 Tioga Lake Drive
Escondido, CA 92029-5405
Returnto: Journals of Discourses
Returnto: Literature Index Page
Returnto: THE MILLENNIAL DISPENSATION's Home Page