Is the Bible you have today, the absolute Word of God? Literalists,those who believe a person is to interpret every word of the Bible, exactlythe way it is written, either ignore the fact or else are ignorant of thefact that words change meanings in a relatively short period of time. Theyare also elevating the work of a biased clerk translator, equating him/herand his work to the same level of validity and authenticity to that ofa prophet. Add to that fact that the Bible has been translated thousandsof times, you therefore have thousands of anonymous people on an equalfooting with that of the prophets. In deed, a very naïve notion butthose who agree with the literalists, read on and be prepared to concedeJohn the Baptist was a homosexual for those are not my words but the translator'sinterpretation of Christ's words, who literalists have elevated to thesame stature of Christ and the ancient prophets.

I have shown in "Was John the Baptist Homosexual" that either the word"malakos" was mistranslated equating it "homosexual" in 1 Corinthians 6:9,

1 Corinthians 6:9
9 ¶ Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdomof God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers,nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind (malakos),"

while in the words of Christ's regarding John the Baptist, the word"malakos" was translated as "soft" in Matthew 11:8 and Luke 7:25,

Matthew 11:8
8 But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft raiment? behold,they that wear soft [clothing] are in kings' houses.

Luke 7:25
25 But what went ye out for to see? A man clothed in soft raiment?Behold, they which are gorgeously apparelled (sic), and live delicately,are in kings' courts.

The fundamental literalists would die if they had to accept thetranslation of "malakos" in 1 Corinthians 6:9 as meaning "homosexual" equatingit as the valid translation of the word "malakos" in all cases. In bothinstances, if they had to translate the word the same way, they would haveto admit that either 1 Corinthians 6:9 says nothing about homosexualityor that Christ said that John the Baptist was a homosexual in Matthew 11:8and Luke 7:25.

But, lets examine other passages. In Proverbs 30:5&6, we read,

Proverbs 30:5-6
5 Every word of God [is] pure: he [is] a shield unto them that puttheir trust in him.

6 Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be founda liar.

In the Book of Revelations, the Apostle John on the Isle of Patmosreceived and wrote the Book of Revelations issuing the following warning,

Revelation 22:18-19
18 For I testify unto every man that heareth (sic) the words of theprophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shalladd unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of thisprophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and outof the holy city, and [from] the things which are written in this book.

However, we know there are missing scripture. In the King Jamestranslation of the Bible, there are at least 15 Books referenced whichdo not exist. In the Catholic Bible, there are an additional 7 or 8 Booksthat aren't a part of the King James version. Did the Catholics add tothe Scripture in the Bible or is the King James version missing 22 or 23Books and the Catholic Bible missing 15 Books?

Is every word in the Bible translated correctly? What is really God'sword? What did God really say in the following scriptures?

Isaiah 36:12

12 But Rabshakeh said, Hath my master sent me to thy master and to theeto speak these words? [hath he] not [sent me] to the men that sit uponthe wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss withyou?

"That they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss withyou?" Is this pornographic?

2 Kings 18:27

27 But Rabshakeh said unto them, Hath my master sent me to thy master,and to thee, to speak these words? [hath he] not [sent me] to the men whichsit on the wall, that they may eat their own dung, and drink their ownpiss with you?

"That they may eat their own dung, and drink their own piss withyou?" Is this pornographic?

Deuteronomy 28:53

53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thysons and of thy daughters, which the LORD thy God hath given thee, in thesiege, and in the straitness (sic), wherewith thine enemies shall distressthee:

"And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thysons and of thy daughters,...."

Deuteronomy 25:11-12

11 When men strive together one with another, and the wife of the onedraweth near for to deliver her husband out of the hand of him that smiteth(sic) him, and putteth (sic) forth her hand, and taketh him by the secrets:

The word "secrets" means testicles or buttocks! She is to put forthher hand and took him by the balls (testicles) or ass! Really... then what?Sounds a little kinky!

Deuteronomy 23:1

1 ¶ He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy membercut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

One who is ruptured in the testicles or has his penis cut off, cannot enter into the congregation of the LORD. Does this condemn the personkicked in the testicles by a horse, to the same fate as the transsexual.

1 Samuel 5:9

9 And it was [so], that, after they had carried it about, the hand ofthe LORD was against the city with a very great destruction: and he smotethe men of the city, both small and great, and they had emerods in theirsecret parts.

God smote the men of the city with hemorrhoids or bleeding piles

1 Samuel 6:4

4 Then said they, What [shall be] the trespass offering which we shallreturn to him? They answered, Five golden emerods, and five golden mice,[according to] the number of the lords of the Philistines: for one plague[was] on you all, and on your lords.

"The trespass offering" is "five golden (hemorrhoids) and five goldenmice." Who is making golden images of hemorrhoids?

Malachi 2:3
3 Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces,[even] the dung of your solemn feasts; and [one] shall take you away withit.

Sounds like a kinky sex trip of sadomasochistic bondage and disciplepeople!

I'm, personally, very happy Christ fulfilled the Law of Moses and gaveus the Gospel of Jesus Christ. But there is a lot of people who, like theJews, have nostalgia for the old Law and won't let Christ fulfilled theancient Law of Moses or the words of the prophets! To those people I say,"You want the law! You have the law and you will be held accountable toit, not the Gospel of Jesus Christ!

David R.W. Wadsworth
Servant of the Most High God

El Santuario Escondido
10387 Tioga Lake Drive
Escondido, CA 92029-5405

(760) 743-5293

Goto: The Word of God, The Book of the Millennial Dispensation

Returnto: Journals of Discourses

Returnto: Literature Index Page